The money has
allowed otherwise-strapped Americans “to pay for essentials, including
rent. The National Multifamily Housing Council said 96% of renters made
payments in June, nearly matching a year earlier, when unemployment was
near a 50-year low,” per the WSJ. “That has prompted some business
lobbyists, including the Mortgage Bankers Association, to ask Congress
to extend the enhanced benefits or offer other relief. Without it, the
association fears apartment building owners will default on their
mortgages.”
The payments won’t continue forever. But several economists say they remain necessary for now.
"We appreciate
that job openings are very scarce right now, so the benefits probably
aren't suppressing employment much, but that will change when states are
able to re-open properly,” Pantheon Macroeconomics chief economist Ian
Shepherdson wrote in a Monday note. Rather than simply chop the $600
payment down unilaterally, Shepherdson argues for scaling the amount of
the payments to beneficiaries’ prior earnings.
But even
Shepherdson says that change can wait, while an extension of the support
for 30 million Americans cannot. Shepherdson writes ripping the rug out
from beneficiaries would cause a “catastrophic plunge” in their incomes
— an outcome he projects negotiators will avoid.
Indeed, the
University of Michigan’s Curtin agrees that the most urgent need now is
preserving the lifeline to the unemployed. The longer-term challenge
facing them, and the broader economy, “is not going to ease
significantly until we have a vaccine or an effective treatment.”
Latest on the federal responsecleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma/ cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma/ cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma/ cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma/ cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma/ cleancare pharma cleancare pharma/ cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma/ cleancare pharma/ cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma/ cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma/ cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma/ cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma/ cleancare pharma cleancare pharma/
A payroll tax cut will be in the GOP's next emergency relief proposal.
But some
Republican lawmakers are fuming about its inclusion: “The emerging GOP
coronavirus relief bill appears likely to embrace some of [Trump’s] key
priorities, despite opposition from within his own party, including a
payroll tax cut, very little aid to state and local governments, and
measures tying school funding to the reopening of classrooms,” Erica
Werner, Jeff Stein, Robert Costa and Seung Min Kim report.
“Some of these
provisions are already sparking pushback from key Senate Republicans,
and an even bigger showdown with Democrats appears inevitable. That
clash could come [today], when [Mnuchin] and White House Chief of Staff
Mark Meadows are set to meet with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.)
and Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) for the first
bipartisan talks on what will almost certainly be the last major
coronavirus relief bill before the November elections. Mnuchin and
Meadows will also meet with Senate Republicans on Tuesday as they seek
to quell any discontent.”
Where things
stand for now: “Mnuchin said that the White House wants the bill to
amount to roughly $1 trillion in new programs, though officials are
expected to use budget gimmicks to make the initial package slightly
larger. Still, Democrats were looking for a much bigger bill."
Always listen to Paul Kane:
Coronavirus fallout
From the U.S.:
cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma/ cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma/ cleancare pharma/ cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma/ cleancare pharma cleancare pharma/ cleancare pharma/ cleancare pharma cleancare pharma/ cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma/ cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma/ cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma/ cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma/ cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma/ cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma/ cleancare pharma/ cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma cleancare pharma
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.